On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 29 September 2008 12:08:52 pm Kevan Miller wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> > Agreed. We've done this before and i bring it up yet again :) >> > >> > Geronimo PMC used Yoko, Yoko failed, they ended up absorbing most of >> > the code. >> >> I wouldn't call Yoko *failed*. It didn't generate enough interest to >> go TLP, but did become a sub-project of Geronimo. Also, portions were >> donated to CXF. Seems like a *success* to me. > > I have to agree. All parts of the Yoko codebase are now supported and > enhanced in active projects. That sounds like a success, not a failure.
So, there is a subproject in Geronimo which is essentially the Yoko codebase, released in a way so non-Geronimo users can consume that codebase?? If so, Excellent. But the matter of fact is, that the STATUS page says "dissolved, with parts going to Geronimo and CXF", which implies a different story, and indeed says "Yoko didn't make it.", i.e. failure. Please call it for what it is, it IS Ok for podlings to end, dissolve, absorbed, evaporate and whatever other possible end-of-life we can imagine... Just because a podling fails, it doesn't mean that any particular person or group of persons fail. Two different things. Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
