On Monday 29 September 2008 12:08:52 pm Kevan Miller wrote: > On Sep 26, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Agreed. We've done this before and i bring it up yet again :) > > > > Geronimo PMC used Yoko, Yoko failed, they ended up absorbing most of > > the code. > > I wouldn't call Yoko *failed*. It didn't generate enough interest to > go TLP, but did become a sub-project of Geronimo. Also, portions were > donated to CXF. Seems like a *success* to me.
I have to agree. All parts of the Yoko codebase are now supported and enhanced in active projects. That sounds like a success, not a failure. -- Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
