On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25/03/2008, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Let's drop the "legally" qualifier from independent... this isn't the > IRS :-) > > In that case I would claim that I am also independent. Although I work > for JPMC I am not paid to work on the Qpid project and all my > contributions for the last 14 months have been in my own time. As > anyone can see from my public LinkedIn profile, I am an architect for > the cash equities business.
That's cool. I'd much rather have people put it all out there and let others decide (full disclosure). Intersecting affiliations should be disclosed IMO. Doesn't matter what that affiliation is... working for part time, full time, indirectly, an indirect client of, working on site, whatever. The whole secrecy thing is strange. Is Rupert one of those guys who can't reveal his affiliations (including people he works with and end clients, not just middle-men)? -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
