On 5/23/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/23/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It makes sense, indeed. But I think it would be nice to have something in > the branding guide more clearly understandable. > So, maybe I should ask the question to the PRC, and open a JIRA issue to put > their answers or some examples in the branding guide? It may be on purpose that the wording is vague and open for debate. This way you get away with a lot, and when things go wrong, you get to point and slap people on the wrists :) Maybe a rewording might make us not so fluent in the English language (and more specifically: the 'legal' English lingo) more confident and knowledgable in these policies/rules/guidelines. I think a JIRA with 'This needs more clarification' would suffice (pointing at the document and this discussion). This way it won't get lost in the ongoing discussions.
I've created a JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-65 Thanks, Xavier Martijn
-- Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
