On 5/23/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmm, it's still not completely clear. Is the phrase "However, the > Public Relations Committee MUST review any releases by affiliated > organizations or groups to ensure they comply with these branding > guidelines." referring to press release announcing the podling only, > or to all press releases? Since it seems it's not allowed to issue > press releases announcing the release, I'd think it's for press > releases that reference the podling. And that's what my article will > do, reference the podling. I think the gist is in the term "Press release". I think a press release is something other than an article. A press release is something like "Foo is adopting Apache Ivy in its product line and providing professional support for it." and send it across the wire, i.e. an announcement. This is of course something different than "This is how you manage your Java project dependencies using Apache Ivy, currently undergoing incubation at the Apache Incubator." which is published on theserverside.com and/or infoq.
It makes sense, indeed. But I think it would be nice to have something in the branding guide more clearly understandable. So, maybe I should ask the question to the PRC, and open a JIRA issue to put their answers or some examples in the branding guide? Xavier
