The ASF Board, by Cliff Schmidt, wrote:
> The report on Heraldry mentions a "single large block checkin"
Two large block check-ins in January. One for python, one for ruby. It
seems as if most of the development is happening off-line and being
committed by proxy. Paul Querna posted one message raising those concerns.
There were no replies, and he didn't follow up.
> "almost no activity" on the dev list
Almost none is a tad of a stretch, but certainly nothing like the level of
developer discussion that one would want to see. And that compounds when
considered in light of the proxy commits.
> and license problems not being responded to "despite requests from the
mentors".
That happened back in October. The last message I see on the subject was
from Ted in November, saying: "I sent a note about that to heraldry-dev and
heard crickets in response." On the other hand, the Mentors are posting
little more than a message a month, each, so there isn't much hands-on
guidance.
Clearly there needs to be some corrective action, and more guidance on how
an ASF project is supposed to conduct itself.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
