Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I think it's unrealistic to expect that the majority of the members of
> the incubator PMC will be involved in most votes.
The Incubator PMC is the second largest in the ASF, and likely to become the
largest in short order. As long as we have sufficient oversight, I agree
with you.
> As far as I can tell, most people who are on the incubator PMC joined
> so they could help to shepherd a specific project through the process
> by serving as a mentor.
That may be true, but as ASF Members (which most are), I would expect (and
have observed) that they have an overall concern regarding events that
effect the ASF.
Personally, my view has been consistent. Most votes regarding a podling can
and should be on their own lists. The PMC should be notified of all such
votes in a timely manner in case other PMC members want to involve
themselves. [And this is why I keep raising the issue of every podling
having at least 3 mentors, so that they have sufficient binding votes.]
Votes to graduate a project should be, IMO, held on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
