Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > That may be true, but as ASF Members (which most are), I would expect
(and
> > have observed) that they have an overall concern regarding events that
> > effect the ASF.
> Sure, but having an overall concern about events that effect the ASF
> is different from having the time to make sure that $RANDOM_PODLING's
> latest release happens in a timely manner. For example, I don't
> personally care all that much about quite a few of our current
> podlings (just not interested in them from a technical point of view),
> so I probably wouldn't go out of my way to review their releases.
Neither do I, but I do want to be notified that they are having a vote in a
timely manner in case I do care, and I want to receive the vote results so
that I can review them, myself, to verify that sufficient Mentors did have
their eyes on the vote.
As I said, the only vote that I think should be on general@ is the
graduation vote.
> That said, if I noticed something particularly wrong and didn't see
> someone else speaking up about it, I'd do something, because like you
> say, I'm a member and I care about the ASF in general.
Exactly.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
