On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 03:45, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 03:23, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > ... > >>In any case, if the vote is positive, we can start using the new rules > >>and continue discussing your proposal as a next step. > > > > No, I would ask that you don't continue as my vote will not be positive > > and at the very least I would like to spend a couple days finishing my > > response. > > It's not that I don't want your proposal on this, it's the very > opposite. I'm just concerned that if we keep on dragging this, projects > like Axion that are coming in now (of which you are part AFAIK) will > remain in a limbo or use old procedures that we already don't want to > see applied anymore.
Well that's just too bad. Things have dragged on around here forever anyway. Another week isn't going to do any harm. > IMHO there is no reason why we can't vote on this > and then vote on something better after a couple of weeks. In any case, > send it in, I'm really interested to see it. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
