#1 - "-1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived"". Where EXACTLY is this process
documented???????? ("how/when should someone send a note to incubator about a project
to get the
ball rolling")
#2 - I was a bit surprised that this note about Charon to incubator did not come from
either me or
sam.
#3 - jetspeed-2 is where to pluto jar(s) will reside. See note from David Sean Taylor
("http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09175.html"). We already have an
Apache project dependent on it.
Thanks,
dims
--- Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:06:13PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > Ted Leung wrote:
> > > I'm unclear as to the project destination here. Your message says its
> > > WS and the proposal
> > > says Jakarta. I just looked and couldn't find it. I also couldn't find
> > > it in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And I don't recall seeing it on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hunh. I just searched the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for "wsrp4j" (case
> insensitive). I found ZERO references to wsrp4j in the May/June/July
> timeframe.
>
> Also searched the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archive since it was started, and I
> found ZERO references.
>
> So how exactly was this projected "accepted"? I see zero discussion before
> Ken's post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That seems *very* inappropriate.
>
> > > As long has voted to accept it, I've no problem. It's just that I'm on
> > > the WS PMC and I can't
> > > remember the vote for this.
> >
> > sam, davinum? in the conference with sam and richard jacob
> > yesterday, ws was clearly identified, and sam commented that
> > although jakarta had been the original destination it had
> > been decided that ws was much more appropriate. i guess no-one
> > updated the wiki.
>
> Fair enough, but Sam isn't the decision maker on whether something gets
> accepted, and not necessarily on where it goes. Especially when there has
> been zero discussion.
>
> > >>the codebase is dependent upon another which is *not* yet open,
> > >>but which will be licensed appropriately and which is intended
> > >>to follow the first one as a donation. for internal ibm reasons
> > >>to which i'm not privy, this must be a rear-drive cart. however,
> > >>since the horse will have safe licensing, i don't anticipate a
> > >>problem.
> > >
> > > I object to this. I would prefer to see both donated together,
> > > especially if one cannot work
> > > without the other.
> >
> > can't be done. has to be this way. not our choice.
>
> I'm not too concerned about having the dependent code *at* the ASF, since we
> usually have dependencies on external things. However, I *do* think a
> necessary precondition is that it becomes available with an ASL-compatible
> license before the incubation is accepted.
>
> > >>please reply asap if you have objections; if i don't see any by
> > >>monday, i'll assume a lazy consensus and get the ball rolling.
> >
> > btw, this is primarily for the pmc, since it's the pmc's vote/decision
> > about acceptance that determines it. non-pmc opinions are
> > eagerly solicited, but non-binding and advisory..
>
> My binding vote is -1 until we see the dependency made available. After
> that, +1 assuming that the WS PMC votes to actually accept the thing
> post-incubation.
>
> I'm also a -1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived" at the
> Incubator.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
