On 7/24/03 4:21 AM, "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted, > >>>> Ok, >>>> >>>> Is the issue here being @xml vs being @incubator? If they need to >>>> be @incubator that's totally fine with me. >>>> Or is there something that I'm missing? >>> >>> >>> >>> IIUC it's all there is to it. >> >> >> If you look at this message in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list >> it seems clear that they went into the incubator @jakarta >> >> http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listId=129&msgNo=2 >> >> So incubator folks, what is the correct policy here? > > Both Tapesptry and Lenya were special cases. We've set policy since > then. All new projects come through Incubator (mail lists, sites, CVS). > Best to just go with the flow. One would also hope that future projects > coming in take a while to incubate, and don't declare "success" and exit > a mere couple of months after arriving. There is no allegation there of > course :-) Good thing its not an allegation because Tapestry took nearly a year. > > - Paul > (Incubator PMC member). -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
