I don't get what's the issue with creating a test Git repo, that is independent from anything else, and that was discussed on the ML
I did the exact same at GitHub just because it was outside Apache then was even more clear that it was a side test to have chance to get common tests instead of long discussions where it's clear that a part of the discussion is that we don't have the same initial culture on the technical parts regards, Hervé Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 19:39:16 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : > Hi > > We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which > I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with). > > I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call to > all: > > “I must however state that the word “consensus” seems to mean nothing in our > little community. I remember we have discussed transferring the site to > git, something I would have done tomorrow based on the positive comments... > but attic-test, where did that come from.” > > I am concerned about people going in different directions, without trying to > get consensus, what the community wants, that way we will never reach a > state where we can get a new site online. > > PMC members know who made the request in self-service but not who initiated > it. > > A concerned committer/PMC/Chair > jan I > > > Sent from my iPad > > > Sent from my iPad
