Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 12:30:46 CEST sebb a écrit : > On 28 April 2018 at 11:15, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > > creating a GitBox/GitHub test repository is easy: it's self service [1] > > I looked at that, and one can only create empty repos for projects > that are registered to use GitBox - see INFRA-16456. ah ok, I didn't know that there was some initial registration to be done: thanks for the info
> > > You'll get an empty Git repository that is read/write both from GitBox and > > GitHub: you'll be able to do the tests you want. The only little issue is > > that future delete of this test repo won't be self service... > > > > Independently from GitBox/GitHub tests, you can ask INFRA to get a > > read-only svn2git mirror, that will prepare the whole Attic site svn > > history as Git history, to not loose the history if you decide to finally > > migrate fully to Git > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > > > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 00:09:08 CEST sebb a écrit : > >> On 27 April 2018 at 17:57, Jan Iversen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Sent from my iPad > >> > > >> >> On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I think it would be useful to have an Attic GitBox test instance so we > >> >> can try out things like Buildbot scripts and online editing. > >> >> > >> >> It might also be a good way to evaluate the pros and cons of the > >> >> various redesigns. > >> >> Sort of like a Wiki page. > >> > > >> > I am not sure what a gitbox test instance consist of, so I tend to be > >> > neutral, but considering our site have not changed for a very long time > >> > I > >> > have to ask is it really needed ? and will someone be responsible for > >> > whatever needs to be maintained over time ? > >> > >> I thought you wanted to move to Git? > >> If so, then it will have to be moved to an ASF GitBox as git-wip is > >> being withdrawn. > >> > >> Having a test instance will allow us to try out Buildbot etc. before > >> any possible move. > >> > >> In any case, the whole point was to have a test instance that can be > >> thrown away if we no longer need it. > >> > >> > In short if you all agree it is a something worth doing, then I will > >> > not > >> > stand in the way. > >> > > >> > rgds > >> > jan I
