On 28 April 2018 at 11:17, Jan Iversen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:09, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 27 April 2018 at 17:57, Jan Iversen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think it would be useful to have an Attic GitBox test instance so we >>>> can try out things like Buildbot scripts and online editing. >>>> >>>> It might also be a good way to evaluate the pros and cons of the >>>> various redesigns. >>>> Sort of like a Wiki page. >>> >>> I am not sure what a gitbox test instance consist of, so I tend to be >>> neutral, but considering our site have not changed for a very long time I >>> have to ask is it really needed ? and will someone be responsible for >>> whatever needs to be maintained over time ? >> >> I thought you wanted to move to Git? >> If so, then it will have to be moved to an ASF GitBox as git-wip is >> being withdrawn. > > yes I do want to move to git, I just did not think of gitbox as the > git-server.
OK. >> >> Having a test instance will allow us to try out Buildbot etc. before >> any possible move. > I see that, but it would also require something like attic-test/a.o if you > really want to test. Buildbot can create public html pages; e.g. for attic-jekyl it creates: https://ci.apache.org/projects/attic/ This could be moved to a subdir so there can be multiple variants. > rgds > jan i >> >> In any case, the whole point was to have a test instance that can be >> thrown away if we no longer need it. >> >>> In short if you all agree it is a something worth doing, then I will not >>> stand in the way. >>> >>> rgds >>> jan I >>> >>>
