> PS: I believe I joked some time ago that it was a pity that GDAL, GEOS, QGIS, > PostGIS, ... didn't share the same geometry classes given that they all > implement the same Single Features/ ISO SQL MM Part 3 model (it is kind of > crazy that we have all to implement WKB, WKT, etc etc), but it really looks > like this is completely what the RFC works around. But I'm afraid this > "libgeom" is a pipe dream
100% agree, but GEOS gets some exemption from this list because it doesn't have curved geometry support. Honestly I'd be totally behind a modern "libgeom" library. Not as a replacement for GEOS, but just to provide a common "geometry representation" container with support for ALL the geometry types. It could even be written in rust :) Nyall > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
