Hi Even, Is it correct to say the workflow for OGR layer in MapServer is similar to that of QGIS? OGR features / geometries are loaded, and then converted into MapServer shapes using the OGRGeometry function [1]. Would using WKB here be any more performant? The PostGIS driver already has code to convert from WKB to shape [2] which could be repurposed.
Seth [1] https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/blob/f3f05d4cf30af615d5f443a1c47c20b6117e52cb/mapogr.cpp#L250 [2] https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/blob/f3f05d4cf30af615d5f443a1c47c20b6117e52cb/mappostgis.cpp#L663 -- web:https://geographika.net twitter: @geographika On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, at 12:27 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > Please find for review "RFC 92 text: WKB Only geometries" at > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/7149 > > This RFC provides shortcuts to avoid instantiation of full OGRGeometry > instances > in scenarios where only the WKB representation of geometries is needed. The > hope is to save CPU time. > > This is something I wanted to at least experiment. I've mixed feelings > if it's something we actually want to adopt. > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
