Done. Congratulations to both GDAL and PROJ for minting their DOI !
Best, Peter <peter.lo...@gmx.de> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2022 um 16:49 Uhr > Von: "Even Rouault" <even.roua...@spatialys.com> > An: "Peter Löwe" <peter.lo...@gmx.de> > Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org, "proj" <p...@lists.osgeo.org> > Betreff: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: DOI for the GDAL project / Springer Handbook of > Geoinformatics > > Ok, I went ahead with a manual upload of GDAL 3.4.1: > https://zenodo.org/record/5884352 , with concept DOI being > https://zenodo.org/record/5884351 > > Can you ask the zenodo help desk to link the later with the github > releases of https://github.com/OSGeo/GDAL ? > > Same for PROJ 8.2.1: https://zenodo.org/record/5884395, with concept DOI > being https://zenodo.org/record/5884394, to be associated with > https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ > > Even > > > Le 20/01/2022 à 15:37, Peter Löwe a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > FYI here's the confirmation by Zenodo about the combined use of manual and > > automated software versioning: > > > > "It is possible to link manual releases to the GitHub integration automated > > workflow. > > You can go ahead and publish the two manual releases and share them here. > > We will then link them to the equivalent GitHub repositories so that when > > you activate the integration new versions will continue under the same > > Concept DOIs of the manual releases" > > > > -> the two repos being referred to are PROJ and GDAL. > > > > I will not be ablé to act on this as I do not have admin access to neither > > the GDAL nor the PROJ repo. > > > > Best, > > Peter > > > > <peter.lo...@gmx.de> > > > > > >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2022 um 10:16 Uhr > >> Von: "Peter Löwe" <peter.lo...@gmx.de> > >> An: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > >> Betreff: [gdal-dev] Fwd: DOI for the GDAL project / Springer Handbook of > >> Geoinformatics > >> > >> Hello gdal-dev-list, > >> > >> regarding the current discussion on how to register DOI for GDAL, I've > >> contacted the helpdesks of Zenodo and DataCite. DataCite is the > >> organisation providing the global DOI-infrastructure. Zenodo is an open > >> access repository where a growing number of OSGeo projects already have > >> registered DOI for their codebases. > >> > >> The question is whether once a DOI for GDAL has been registered > >> manually/retrospectively for the current release (GDAL 3.4.1) it will be > >> feasible to switch to automated DOI versioning for all future GDAL > >> releases. > >> > >> The DataCite helpdesk confirms, this approach from their infrastructure > >> perspective: "From the DataCite side I don't see anything that would mean > >> the manual workflow could not change to an automated one, but this is > >> something that Zenodo would need to confirm." > >> > >> The Zenodo helpdesk confirmed this approach last night: "We can actually > >> connect this record to a "virtual" release on our side as if it was > >> actually part of the Github repo. Could you give us more details, for > >> example, the records in question and the GitHub repos?". > >> -> I have told them that this applies to GDAL (among other projects). No > >> response yet. > >> Maybe someone of the project community is interested and able to contact > >> the Zenodo help desk directly on this (i...@zenodo.org) ? > >> > >> The deadline to include a DOI for the GDAL project to the Open Source > >> Chapter of the Springer Handbook on Geographic Information is today end of > >> business Pacific Time. > >> > >> By now, ten OSGeo projects will have their DOI referenced in the Chapter > >> (more to come in the next hours). It would be awesome if GDAL could be > >> included, too. > >> > >> Best, > >> Peter > >> > >> <peter.lo...@gmx.de> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gdal-dev mailing list > >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
