On 5/3/20 10:05 PM, Even Rouault wrote: >> It's indeed not possible to make everybody happy, so the question is who >> you do mind the least to make unhappy. >> >> If nothing changes packagers like me will be unhappy because they need >> to reintroduce the virtual dependency for the unstable C++ ABI. >> >> C-only users will be unhappy about having to rebuild their code when the >> only C++ ABI breaks. >> >> And you will be unhappy if you have to split the library. > > OK, so here's what I intend to change for RC3: > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/2466/files
Bumping the SONAME is great, the rest looks good too. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
