Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> writes: >> It's indeed not possible to make everybody happy, so the question is who >> you do mind the least to make unhappy. >> >> If nothing changes packagers like me will be unhappy because they need >> to reintroduce the virtual dependency for the unstable C++ ABI. >> >> C-only users will be unhappy about having to rebuild their code when the >> only C++ ABI breaks. >> >> And you will be unhappy if you have to split the library. > > OK, so here's what I intend to change for RC3: > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/2466/files
Not 100% sure I followed, but: If you change the shlib major number, you have changed the ABI, even if the symbols are the same. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
