Hi Markus, Thanks for your feedback
> Regarding WKT2, a remark from a GRASS GIS developer being a user of > GDAL/PROJ: > > I understand that WKT2 is long overdue and thus should be pushed as much > and as early as possible. Otherwise it would take a long time and a rather > long and painful transition process to switch to WKT2. My suggestion is to > try to keep the painful transition process as short as possible and switch > to WKT2 ASAP. People like to stick to what they have and what they know, so > if something better is available, some convincing is needed. So you would be in favor of making OSRExportToWkt() default to WKT2 ? (probably WKT2:2018 while we are at it ? Not just the output of gdalinfo / ogrinfo utilities. I was shy in doing so, because it will likely require updating a good deal of GDAL autotests, but oh well... What annoys me a bit more is the case of XML files like GDAL VRT, OGR VRT or .aux.xml that contains serialized SRS and that I wanted to be backward compatible with older GDAL versions as much as possible. > > Backwards compatibility wrt reading WKT1 needs to be maintained because > already existing datasets must still be readable. Yes this is of course done. Export to older WKT versions will likely still be needed for some formats too > Regarding the BBOX, it should be made clear that the reported extents are a > suggestion, not a limitation. The semantics is a bit fuzzy. The WKT standard mentions "Extent describes the spatial and/or temporal applicability of a CRS, datum, datum ensemble, coordinate operation or Bound CRS". For a CRS, you can go beyond depending on the numeric stability of the implementation of the projection method (in case of a projected CRS). For a coordinate operation, if it involves a grid, the BBOX should be interpreted in a rather strict way (that's what PROJ master does internally when computing the most appropriate coordinate transformation given all the constraints it is given) Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev