On 19 June 2018 at 11:22, Alex HighViz <alexhigh...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Regrettably I overstated the performance in my previous post, due to a bug > that is now solved. With the solved bug, Pronto is about 50% slower than GDAL > directly. I believe this is still good considering the benefits, but not as > glamorous as I first thought. I have also applied it on a set of 100000 x > 1000 rasters and the results are consistent. > > The related post has been updated (and I still consider it "promising"): > https://github.com/ahhz/raster/blob/master/docs/_posts/2018-06-14-Preliminary-benchmark-results-are-promising.md
I might have missed that, but there seem to be no information about used - compiler(s) and their versions - compilation flags Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
