On 14 June 2018 at 14:17, Alex HighViz <alexhigh...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I few times I have posted to the list trying to promote the idea of > providing iterators over pixels in a raster band , and more generally to > make raster data accessible using (future) standard conforming ranges.
In case you are not aware, Boost.GIL provides such abstractions [1] It's not yet pure C++20 ranges, there will be at some point. Although Boost.GIL design is a complex one, it's IMHO not trivial to beat its feature-completness, flexibility, extensibility and performance it can generate. FYI, I have half-baked IO extension for GDAL. I'm going to continue/finish it as soon as next Boost version is released which should include completely new version of IO layer. Then, it can become another one to compare in your benchmark. [1] http://boostorg.github.io/gil/develop/doc/html/design_guide.html [2] https://lists.boost.org/boost-announce/2011/01/0281.php Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
