Hi all, I've run into a problem when building universal binaries for GDAL 1.11.1 on OS X 10.9.5. If I follow the instructions at
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/BuildingOnMac and set CFLAGS="-arch i386 -arch x86_64" CXXFLAGS="-arch i386 -arch x86_64" LDFLAGS="-arch i386 -arch x86_64" the software builds without any errors I can tell, but provides no vector formats: $ ./parts/gdal/bin/ogrinfo --formats Supported Formats: Running gdalinfo --formats, on the other hand, gives me all the raster formats I expect. My configure commands is below: $ ./configure --prefix=/Users/sean/code/frs-wheel-builds/parts/gdal ARCHFLAGS=-arch i386 -arch x86_64 CFLAGS=-arch i386 -arch x86_64 CXXFLAGS=-arch i386 -arch x86_64 LDFLAGS=-arch i386 -arch x86_64 --with-threads --disable-debug --disable-static --without-grass --without-libgrass --without-jpeg12 --with-jasper=/Users/sean/code/frs-wheel-builds/parts/jasper --with-libtiff=internal --with-jpeg --with-gif --with-png --with-geotiff=internal --with-sqlite3=/usr --with-pcraster=internal --with-pcraster=internal --with-pcidsk=internal --with-bsb --with-grib --with-pam --with-geos=/Users/sean/code/frs-wheel-builds/parts/geos/bin/geos-config --with-static-proj4=/Users/sean/code/frs-wheel-builds/parts/proj4 --with-expat=/usr --with-libjson-c=/Users/sean/code/frs-wheel-builds/parts/json-c --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr --with-libz=/usr --with-curl=/usr/bin/curl-config --without-python If I rebuild, using the same configuration but omitting the -arch flags, ogrinfo --formats reports all the vector formats I expect. I should add that MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.6 is set in the environment for all these builds. I'm doing that because I'm building GDAL to be used with C Extension modules for the Python from python.org (which uses SDK version 10.6). Here are the details on my gcc: gcc -v Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0 Thread model: posix Anybody run into this problem before or see something I'm obviously doing wrong? Thanks,
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
