Hi Mateusz, Il 06/10/2011 23:03, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: > On 06/10/11 21:52, Antonio Valentino wrote: >> Il 06/10/2011 22:01, Etienne Tourigny ha scritto: >>> Thanks for the information. It seems that using git-svn is more >>> suited for working locally, and then commiting back to the svn repos, >>> or as an easy way to stay in-sync with the main repos (like you do). >>> >> >> IMHO the trick is using a separate branch for developing new features in >> order to be able to use git freely. >> >> When the job is done one should just rebase (locally) on the branch in >> sync with svn and use git-svn to push hanges back into svn. >> >> The weak point in the workflow is the initial cloning of the svn repo. > > Indeed, because every developer aiming in the git svn workflow > has to do this initial step on his own. AFAIK, there is no way to > centralise it. > > Best regards,
I'm wondering if there is some way to use a svn dump for the initial setup of the git repo. The svn dump could be downloaded (in compressed form) via FTP in a way that is by far faster than the initial git svn fetch Another option is to make available a pre-loaded git repo in compressed form. Developers that want to use git should download and uncompress the pre-loaded repo and re-sync using git-svn for getting last svn commits. -- Antonio Valentino _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
