On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Antonio Valentino <antonio.valent...@tiscali.it> wrote: > Hi Etienne, > > Il 06/10/2011 22:01, Etienne Tourigny ha scritto: >> Thanks for the information. It seems that using git-svn is more >> suited for working locally, and then commiting back to the svn repos, >> or as an easy way to stay in-sync with the main repos (like you do). >> > > IMHO the trick is using a separate branch for developing new features in > order to be able to use git freely. > > When the job is done one should just rebase (locally) on the branch in > sync with svn and use git-svn to push hanges back into svn. >
GOTCHA! That sounds quite reasonable. > The weak point in the workflow is the initial cloning of the svn repo. > I guess if you were to clone the repo from a recent revision (not the whole changeset), you would speed things up considerably. Is there a way to do that? >> For now, I will stick to straight svn (or straight git) because I >> don't know enough about git and don't want to break things! >> >> thanks, Etienne > > > -- > Antonio Valentino > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
