Selon Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org>: Hermann,
I'm not aware of any GDAL Trac ticket with the patch attached, some text explaining why and when it is necessary/usefull, and ideally a step by step scenario and sample data that demonstrates its usefulness. This is the general procedure to submit enhancements & bug fixes, otherwise there's a high chance the patch will be lost forever in the depths of mail boxes. Best regards, Even > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Hermann Peifer<pei...@gmx.eu> wrote: > > Jukka Rahkonen wrote: > >> > >> Hermann Peifer <peifer <at> gmx.eu> writes: > >> > >>> Adam wrote: > >>>> > >>>> You can test with http://pastebin.com/m45e46f53 > >>>> Also remember to use -wo SKIP_NOSOURCE=YES > >>>> > >>> Adam, > >>> > >>> Will your patch appear in trunk/gdal/alg at some point in time? > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> It would be very interesting to > >> test the effect of this patch with JPEG2000 images ... > > > > There have been no recent changes to > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/trunk/gdal/alg/gdalwarpoperation.cpp > > > > It looks like you and me are the only users interested in this patch which > > makes gdalwarp so much faster, simply by avoiding warp operations on > > irrelevant pixels. > > I am also interested but didn't have time to try (was on the road)... > So we are at least three :) > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
