On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:48:35PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 14:09, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > On 12/12/22 14:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > > I think that is the case, plus the question if one can use a non-standard
> > > function to implement a standard function (and if it would be triggered
> > > by seeing an expected prototype for the non-standard function).
> >
> > I guess implementing a standard function by calling a non-standard one is
> > fine.
> > The implementation is free to do what it pleases, as long as it provides the
> > expected interface.
>
> Even if the program provides a function called mempcpy?
And even does something completely different...
Jakub
