On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 14:09, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On 12/12/22 14:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I think that is the case, plus the question if one can use a non-standard > > function to implement a standard function (and if it would be triggered > > by seeing an expected prototype for the non-standard function). > > I guess implementing a standard function by calling a non-standard one is > fine. > The implementation is free to do what it pleases, as long as it provides the > expected interface. Even if the program provides a function called mempcpy?
