> Am 10.11.2022 um 17:45 schrieb Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de>:
>
>
>
>> Am 10.11.22 um 16:25 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
>>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 15:23, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 15:17, Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 10.11.22 um 16:05 schrieb Martin Liška:
>>>>> On 11/10/22 15:45, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, I just observed that links like
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ceased to work. Presumably this is to sphinx stuff, but it would be
>>>>>> great if not hundreds of links across the web to GCC pages like the
>>>>>> above would be 404.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know that the new link is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but that doesn't help with existing pointers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Deep" links like https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.html#avr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> won't work either, so all reasonable anchors have been ditched, too?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Johann
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> We're working on that and we'll create a redirection:
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for pointing out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> Ok thanks, I left a note there.
>>>
>>> The second part of your note about deep links into the new docs is a
>>> completely separate issue. That can't be fixed with HTTP redirects for
>>> the old URLs.
>> And there are still anchors, they're just different:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.html#cmdoption-with-avrlibc
>> Now there are anchors to every single option, which is much better
>> than it used to be.
>
> Yes, its nice. But existing links are still invalidated. Just take some
> tutorial that explains how to set up gcc, where you want to provide
> references that are point-on and not just "gcc.gnu.org".
>
> Does this also mean that "deep" links to onlinedocs won't work any more?
How about moving the new docs to
onlinedocs-new/ and simply keeping the old
Doc tree around? Re-using the old dir looks like a mistake in hindsight?
Richard
> Johann
>
>
