Am 10.11.22 um 16:25 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 15:23, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 15:17, Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> wrote:



Am 10.11.22 um 16:05 schrieb Martin Liška:
On 11/10/22 15:45, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Hi, I just observed that links like

https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html

ceased to work.  Presumably this is to sphinx stuff, but it would be
great if not hundreds of links across the web to GCC pages like the
above would be 404.

I know that the new link is

https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.html

but that doesn't help with existing pointers.

"Deep" links like https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.html#avr

won't work either, so all reasonable anchors have been ditched, too?

Johann

Hello.

We're working on that and we'll create a redirection:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610

Thanks for pointing out.

Martin

Ok thanks, I left a note there.

The second part of your note about deep links into the new docs is a
completely separate issue. That can't be fixed with HTTP redirects for
the old URLs.

And there are still anchors, they're just different:
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.html#cmdoption-with-avrlibc
Now there are anchors to every single option, which is much better
than it used to be.

Yes, its nice. But existing links are still invalidated. Just take some tutorial that explains how to set up gcc, where you want to provide references that are point-on and not just "gcc.gnu.org".

Does this also mean that "deep" links to onlinedocs won't work any more?

Johann


Reply via email to