On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 02:17, Neven Sajko <nsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 08:11, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, 00:48 Neven Sajko via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> This is why I am asking for this feature to be documented. It seems > >> like this would be the most appropriate place: > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#InputOperands > >> > >> I would have tried to contribute a doc fix myself, but I couldn't find > >> the sources for the online docs in the GCC Git repository. > > > > > > > > git grep is your friend. The relevant section is: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/doc/extend.texi;h=e110cb010617bfb78e740433c3aa30a7399b504e;hb=HEAD#l10344 > > I posted a patch back then (a week ago) to gcc-patches, but there was > no response. I'm not complaining, but I wonder if I should maybe ping > a developer interested in the extended asm extension specifically? Who > might that be?
I don't think there is a maintainer for asm statements, but a docs maintainer might be relevant for this patch. You can also just ping the patch by replying to it on the list, without CCing anybody particular. > This is the patch in the archive: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565339.html I replied to the mail.
