On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 08:11, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, 00:48 Neven Sajko via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> >> This is why I am asking for this feature to be documented. It seems >> like this would be the most appropriate place: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#InputOperands >> >> I would have tried to contribute a doc fix myself, but I couldn't find >> the sources for the online docs in the GCC Git repository. > > > > git grep is your friend. The relevant section is: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/doc/extend.texi;h=e110cb010617bfb78e740433c3aa30a7399b504e;hb=HEAD#l10344
I posted a patch back then (a week ago) to gcc-patches, but there was no response. I'm not complaining, but I wonder if I should maybe ping a developer interested in the extended asm extension specifically? Who might that be? This is the patch in the archive: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565339.html Thanks, Neven
