David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com>:
> I realize that reverting the change would cause another regression.
> My suggestion is that the bisection of reposurgeon may be easier /
> faster and could help you pinpoint the root cause. Then you could
> consider a different solution to the problem that you were trying to
> fix with the initial patch. You could see explicitly how the
> reposurgeon patch fixes one problem and how it creates a different
> problem in Trunk.
Apologies for the belated reply. I've been on semi-vacation at the
World Boardgaming Championships for the last week, working on NTPsec
stuff only.
Yes, if I were certain of the SVN revision at which conversion was last good,
I would do this. Since I'm not, and can't regress on two timelines at once,
I have to choose one.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
