On 07/23/2018 10:29 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > > >> On Jul 23, 2018, at 12:21 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >> Hell, I'd live with doing a "reasonable effort" for the vast majority of >> our branches. Other than the trunk, active release branches and a few >> active development branches I don't think we really care about 'em. >> >> jeff > > There are two approaches to conversion: (1) convert what's active and > preserve the old system indefinitely for reference access; (2) convert > everything 100% so the old system can be retired. > > It seems that Eric has been trying for #2, which is fine if doable. But #1 > is also a reasonable option and if the nature of the beast makes #2 > acceptable, going for #1 is a plan I would definitely support. Yea. I suspect we'll keep the SVN repo around read-only essentially forever so the links in bugzilla continue to work. There's probably other uses of the SVN version #s that we'd like to preserve.
jeff
