On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers > <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > >> When there is -static, -dynamic-linker won't passed to ld. -static, > >> -shared, -pie should be mutually exclusive for GCC driver. > > > > A static PIE shouldn't specify an interpreter; it should handle all > > dynamic relocation processing itself. Thus, it's correct not to specify > > -dynamic-linker when building a static PIE. > > If -dynamic-linker isn't specified, linker will use > the default dynamic linker:
I'd say that's a bug in ld - that it shouldn't specify an interpreter at all (that the startup code / libc for static PIEs needs to include all the relevant parts of the dynamic linker to make the binary relocate itself). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
