gcc  

Messages by Date

• 2024/07/05 gcc-13-20240705 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Emanuele Torre via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions LIU Hao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: GCC Download Issue Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 GCC Download Issue Dinesh M via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 gcc-12-20240704 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 DW_TAG_compile_unit's references to .debug_line and .loc directive extension Fangrui Song
• 2024/07/04 Ccccc. C. C. Susan Difraia via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
• 2024/07/03 gcc-11-20240703 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
• 2024/07/03 Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Mark Wielaard
• 2024/07/02 gmplib.org Down Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Florian Weimer
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/01 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
• 2024/06/30 gcc-15-20240630 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/30 unwanted communication Mark Wielaard
• 2024/06/30 FUCK YOU WG21 FOR THIS import std; BS THAT BREAKS MY LIBRARY. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 gcc-14-20240629 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Dry Ft Bob Lange
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 gas or as generates large bins Houssem H1 via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 gcc-13-20240628 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/28 Re: Please help Mohd Kashif via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 Please help MR DEEPAK via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Basile Starynkevitch
• 2024/06/27 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/27 gcc-12-20240627 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/27 consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/06/26 gcc-11-20240626 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/26 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/25 Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
• 2024/06/24 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-06-27 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/23 gcc-15-20240623 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/23 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
• 2024/06/23 Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/23 [no subject] Ernesto via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 gcc-14-20240622 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
• 2024/06/22 Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
• 2024/06/22 gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
• 2024/06/21 Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword Eric Gallager via Gcc
• 2024/06/21 gcc-13-20240621 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/21 Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
• 2024/06/21 SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/06/21 Re: pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/20 pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy CH HC via Gcc
• 2024/06/20 gcc-12-20240620 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/20 Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
• 2024/06/20 GCC 11.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/20 GCC 12.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/20 GCC 12.4 Released Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/06/19 gcc-11-20240619 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/19 Re: Union initialization semantics Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/19 Re: Union initialization semantics Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/19 Union initialization semantics Alexander Monakov
• 2024/06/18 Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
• 2024/06/18 Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Joseph Myers via Gcc
• 2024/06/17 Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 gcc-15-20240616 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
• 2024/06/16 Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/15 gcc-14-20240615 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/15 -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
• 2024/06/14 gcc-13-20240614 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/14 Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
• 2024/06/14 Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Georg-Johann Lay
• 2024/06/14 Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/14 Re: Minor correction Gerald Pfeifer
• 2024/06/13 Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Iain Sandoe via Gcc
• 2024/06/13 gcc-12-20240613 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/13 Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org William Seurer via Gcc
• 2024/06/13 GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 gcc-11-20240612 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Sourceware Open Office, Friday 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: Question about optimizing function pointers for direct function calls Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mark Wielaard
• 2024/06/12 gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: Question about optimizing function pointers for direct function calls Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: Question about optimizing function pointers for direct function calls Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• 2024/06/12 Re: How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/11 How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"? Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• 2024/06/11 Re: Hosting a Mirror Site Ganesh Ram via Gcc
• 2024/06/11 Hosting a Mirror Site Ganesh Ram via Gcc
• 2024/06/11 Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Andreas Schwab via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages