> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 1:55 PM > To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Question about overloaded operators > > On 11/10/2013 11:08 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > > In C++, when a binary/unary operator is overloaded, then the > build_x_[binary/unary]_op replaces it with a call expression. Is there a way > to know from the call expression (assume we are in the gimplification stage) > what the operator is? I tried to look around but I didn't find any obvious way > to figure this info out. > > Not a simple one. You might factor out the code for that in > write_unqualified_id into a separate function. >
Semi crazy thought...If I do something like a string compare for the operation after operator toward the end of the function, will I get what I want? I guess another way to ask this is, will a '+' operation, for example, be mapped to a function ending in something other than "operator+" > Jason
