On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets > >> > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. > >> > > >> > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. > >> > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. > >> [...] > >> > >> It would be nice if somebody would review this patch. The initial > >> commit had fallout on a few targets: > >> > >> alpha-linux: > >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9537&mode=view > >> mn10300-linux: > >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view > >> sparc64-linux: > >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9655&mode=view > >> tic6x-uclinux: > >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9647&mode=view > >> powerpc64le-linux: > >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9638&mode=view > >> (all other PPC variants, too.) > > > > This is still broken. Today it's two weeks. Can we please have the > > patch ACKed or revert the patch? > > I agree. This is ridiculous. Would some global reviewer please approve the > fix?
Patch is ok. _Please_ mark patches properly and send them in a separate thread. Otherwise I just notice [buildbot] and skip the mail. A proper subject would be [PATCH] Unbreak bootstrap on XYZ Richard.
