On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> > wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets >> > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. >> > >> > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. >> > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. >> [...] >> >> It would be nice if somebody would review this patch. The initial >> commit had fallout on a few targets: >> >> alpha-linux: >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9537&mode=view >> mn10300-linux: >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view >> sparc64-linux: >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9655&mode=view >> tic6x-uclinux: >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9647&mode=view >> powerpc64le-linux: >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9638&mode=view >> (all other PPC variants, too.) > > This is still broken. Today it's two weeks. Can we please have the > patch ACKed or revert the patch?
I agree. This is ridiculous. Would some global reviewer please approve the fix? Thanks, David
