Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> writes:
> On 2012-10-02 05:45 , Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> Anybody else with things they want to merge during stage1?
> Finally, I've been thinking of porting asan/tsan to replace
> mudflap. Dodji, you expressed interest in it recently.
Yes I did. A bit too recently, I am afraid. :-)
Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 10/02/2012 08:30 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> Finally, I've been thinking of porting asan/tsan to replace mudflap.
>> Dodji, you expressed interest in it recently.
> That's further out most likely.
Yes, I think a *final* version with feature parity with the asan/tsan of
llvm is definitely for after 4.8. Though ...
Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
> I think it would be very nice to get at least asan port for 4.8, but
> I guess it depends on how much work is on it. Killing mudflap would be
> nice.
... I'd like to try and see if we can have something dubbed experimental
with very basic functionality into 4.8 first, and then work from there
toward feature parity with asan/tsan llvm.
What do you think?
--
Dodji
