On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:30:02AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Finally, I've been thinking of porting asan/tsan to replace mudflap.
> Dodji, you expressed interest in it recently.
>
> Jakub, Richi, Joseph, should we do this during the next stage 1?
> I'm not sure how much mudflap is actually used. If it isn't, maybe
> this work can be done after stage 1 closes, but I would like to get
> an explicit OK from the RMs. This is work that can be done on a
> branch and merge back into trunk for 4.9 at the next stage 1.
I think it would be very nice to get at least asan port for 4.8, but
I guess it depends on how much work is on it. Killing mudflap would be
nice.
I think there is no reason to close stage 1 already mid October, that is
just fortnight ahead, and the last stage3 went IMHO fine even when it
started on November, 8th.
So I think end of October should be fine.
LRA/x86* should (if everything gets reviewed and adjusted for reviews in time)
still be merged, AFAIK Kai is working on the type promotion/demotion pass
which would be nice too.
I still have plans for multi-bb range reassoc optimization and doing
something about vectorization of conditional loads/stores.
Jakub
