On 05/07/2012 03:11 PM, Christian Bruel wrote: > > >> What about a generic name such as -fextension- (or both -fextension- and >> -mextension-) for options that GCC itself will ignore, if -mbsp= is >> considered inappropriate? I'd prefer that to delimiting such options with >> --start-specs and --end-specs. >> > > you mean, gcc would ignore options in the -fextension string ?. For > instance an invocation would be > > gcc -spec=board.spec -foo -fextension-foo ?
as a matter of fact gcc -spec=board.spec -fextension-foo could be enough > > instead of > > gcc -spec=board.spec --start-specs -foo --end-specs > > OK, both allow to fix the problem, with a minor backward compatibility > for our BSP integrator that could be handled easily. > > If agreement, are you going to propose something ?, or do you want to > wait me to propose a patch ? > > Many thanks, > > Christian
