> What about a generic name such as -fextension- (or both -fextension- and > -mextension-) for options that GCC itself will ignore, if -mbsp= is > considered inappropriate? I'd prefer that to delimiting such options with > --start-specs and --end-specs. >
you mean, gcc would ignore options in the -fextension string ?. For instance an invocation would be gcc -spec=board.spec -foo -fextension-foo ? instead of gcc -spec=board.spec --start-specs -foo --end-specs OK, both allow to fix the problem, with a minor backward compatibility for our BSP integrator that could be handled easily. If agreement, are you going to propose something ?, or do you want to wait me to propose a patch ? Many thanks, Christian
