YuGr <tetra2...@googlemail.com> writes: > On Monday 18 January 2010 16:19:23 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >> As previously discussed at length, many changes are needed in various >> parts of GCC to work well for targets where char is wider than 8 bits; >> they never worked well even when GCC used to have such ports. If adding >> such a port, many substantial code changes will be needed as well as >> substantial testsuite changes; not just patching one test. > > Ok, thanks Joseph. I guess we'll just patch our local c-torture then.
I actually think it would be fine to use a dg-requires or a #ifdef in this test. dg-requires is probably better but I'm not sure offhand whether it works in the c-torture/execute directory. As Joseph says, other tests will have to be changed as well, but that isn't a reason not to fix this test. Ian
