On Monday 18 January 2010 16:19:23 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, YuGr wrote: > > But according to C99 Standard (see Usual arithmetic conversions, > > 6.3.1.8): > > First the integer promotions are applied, so you need UCHAR_MAX not to be > representable as int (not just as short). > > As previously discussed at length, many changes are needed in various > parts of GCC to work well for targets where char is wider than 8 bits; > they never worked well even when GCC used to have such ports. If adding > such a port, many substantial code changes will be needed as well as > substantial testsuite changes; not just patching one test.
Ok, thanks Joseph. I guess we'll just patch our local c-torture then. -- Best regards, Yuri
