On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Rainer Orth
<r...@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090729 c_lto_20090729_0.o-c_lto_20090729_1.o link
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20090729 c_lto_20090729_0.o-c_lto_20090729_1.o execute
-w
output is:
ld: warning: symbol `i' has differing sizes:
(file c_lto_20090729_0.o value=0x8; file c_lto_20090729_1.o value=0x4);
c_lto_20090729_0.o definition taken
ld: warning: symbol `j' has differing sizes:
(file c_lto_20090729_0.o value=0x4; file c_lto_20090729_1.o value=0x8);
c_lto_20090729_1.o definition taken
This seems like it cannot work.
Ah. We don't expect the linker to complain here - GNU ld accepts different
size common sections. The testcase is reduced from broken SPEC CPU 2000
source ...
If you happen to know a linker option that would silence the warning ...
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1984/chapter2-88783?a=view#chapter2-7
seems to recommend the -t linker flag.
--
Marc Glisse
