Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > Joe Buck wrote: >> Nothing final has been decided. There are some efforts under way of >> finding ways to reassure RMS that it's possible to do plugins in a way >> that doesn't open the door to unrestricted use of gcc internals by >> proprietary compilers, so it would be counterproductive right now for >> everyone to yell at RMS. It would be even more counterproductive to >> start an argument on this list, since the main decision-maker doesn't >> read it. Sorry about that. > > Can we count on the fact that the SVN branch will be synced from time to > time to the mainline ?
synchronized ...from... the mainline... This might change a lot the meaning of my message. :-/ Regards (Doh!) -- Emmanuel Fleury Maître de conférence, | Bureau: 261 LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Tél: +33 (0)5 40 00 69 34 351, Cours de la Libération | Mél: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 33405 Talence Cedex, France | Web: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury