Joe Buck wrote: > > Nothing final has been decided. There are some efforts under way of > finding ways to reassure RMS that it's possible to do plugins in a way > that doesn't open the door to unrestricted use of gcc internals by > proprietary compilers, so it would be counterproductive right now for > everyone to yell at RMS. It would be even more counterproductive to > start an argument on this list, since the main decision-maker doesn't > read it. Sorry about that.
Can we count on the fact that the SVN branch will be synced from time to time to the mainline ? I mean on http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html, one can read: plugin This branch contains work for a plugin infrastructure in gcc to enable additional checking work. This branch is maintained by Eric Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] and will be merged with mainline from time to time. Patches will be marked with the tag [plugin] in the subject line. Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. -- Jeremy S. Anderson