Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> Nothing final has been decided.  There are some efforts under way of
> finding ways to reassure RMS that it's possible to do plugins in a way
> that doesn't open the door to unrestricted use of gcc internals by
> proprietary compilers, so it would be counterproductive right now for
> everyone to yell at RMS.  It would be even more counterproductive to
> start an argument on this list, since the main decision-maker doesn't
> read it.  Sorry about that.

Can we count on the fact that the SVN branch will be synced from time to
time to the mainline ?

I mean on http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html, one can read:

plugin
    This branch contains work for a plugin infrastructure in gcc to
    enable additional checking work. This branch is maintained by Eric
    Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] and will be merged with mainline from
    time to time. Patches will be marked with the tag [plugin] in the
    subject line.

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
  -- Jeremy S. Anderson

Reply via email to