On 1/8/08, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh that clears up my confusion. So the right fix would be downgrading this > redefinition problem to be pedwarn instead. But I see no point in creating a > bug report if its just gonna be closed as invalid, so I hope we can discuss > if its feasible to downgrade this error to be a pedwarn.
It is already a pedwarn. Just the C++ front-end enables pedwarn as being errors by default and downgrades them as being warnings with -fpermissive. This is the whole point of -fpermissive. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
