On 08/01/2008, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh that clears up my confusion. So the right fix would be downgrading this > redefinition problem to be pedwarn instead. But I see no point in creating a > bug report if its just gonna be closed as invalid, so I hope we can discuss > if its feasible to downgrade this error to be a pedwarn. > > What I see right now this distributions plug -fpermissive in and just go away. > But I don't like workarounding gcc this way. I hope we can all agree that > downrading this error to be a pedwarn is the correct way to go. >
I am sorry you didn't understand my email and didn't read it completely. I tried my best. Cheers, Manuel.
